Make wires automations visually. ChatAPI gives you a product you own.
Make.com (formerly Integromat) is more powerful than most no-code automation tools — and with that power comes a steeper learning curve. Founders often start there and find that complex scenarios get hard to maintain, and that they still don't own a real codebase. ChatAPI takes a plain-English description and generates the actual application. Here's how they compare.
| ChatAPI | Make.com | |
|---|---|---|
| What it produces | A real app with its own codebase | Visual automation scenarios |
| Learning curve | Describe it in plain English | Powerful but can get complex fast |
| Your own UI & users | Yes — full app, auth, billing | No — runs behind the scenes |
| Maintainability at scale | Standard code any dev can read | Large scenarios get hard to manage |
| Do you own the output? | Yes — exportable codebase | No — lives inside Make |
| Pricing model | Flat monthly ($10–$50) | Per-operation; scales with volume |
Make can call APIs inside its own platform, but the result lives in Make and isn't a product you own. ChatAPI writes the API logic into a real codebase that is your application — with its own UI, users, and billing.
For building a product, yes — you describe what you want in plain English instead of assembling and maintaining visual scenarios. Make remains great for pure internal automation.
Auth, recurring billing, and a customer dashboard — pre-wired so you can charge from day one.
AI features, accounts, and usage-based billing — wired into a product you can charge for.
Describe what you want to build and ChatAPI wires the APIs for you. Free to start.
Start building free